Unit 1 Draft
In
From Pencils to Pixels by Dennis
Baron, the author addresses the shift in writing technology from as early as
written speech to today and the future with the computer. Additionally, the
author speaks about the backlash that occurs from people once a new form of
technology is accepted. This was done to show that people aren’t only against
the shift to a more digital form of writing as people were not content with the
invention of the telephone. When describing this Baron states, “Morse refused
Bell’s offer to sell him the rights to the telephone patent. He was convinced
that no one would want the telephone because it was unable to provide any
permanent record of a conversation,” (Baron).
Furthermore, Baron spoke of “stages”
of how literacy technologies go to the public. It starts with only being
available to a small number of people in order to “try out” the technology
before it slowly enters the market place. This is done in order to ensure that
the technology will do well in the market place since the costs are initially
so high.
Baron’s project is to emphasize how
literacy technologies are changing very frequently, yet we will typically still
use what has been done in the past in addition to what is new. For example,
even though the computer has made writing more digital, we still go back to
using a pencil and ink for more formal documents such as signatures.
This source is a scholarly journal,
which increases its credibility. This is known because Baron is a professional
in the field, and his research can connect to what he wrote about. His project
influenced the genre because it is easier to trust someone that is an expert in
the field of his or her writing.
I believe that Baron’s project
succeeded because he effectively spoke about the claims he wanted to make. He
wanted to show how technology that emerges typically comes with backlash, but
then is followed by most people becoming accustomed to it.
In
the article, Technology has Changed
Advertising Forever, by Carlos Gutierrez Jr., it was argued that
innovations in technology have changed the way we used to know advertising.
Having advertising as one of my majors, it is very interesting to know these
changes, as the work environment I may be in one day will be as a result of the
changes made. The author’s project was to show that there have been drastic
changes in the industry and wrote this to inform readers through a discussion
and an interview with Mitchell Reichgut from Adtech about these changes. The
genre of this source is an interview, and his project might have influenced the
genre because it would only make sense to hear about these innovative changes
from someone who sees it first-hand. It would be hard to write an article
depicting the changes in advertising due to technology without hearing from an
expert.
I feel like this article succeeded
because I have been introduced to these changes previously from my classes, and
it hit all of the points I have already learned. Additionally, I liked how the
author gave statistics in costs and revenue from different technologies because
it makes it more real in that you can see where these changes specifically came
from. For example, when describing the money put into online advertising
compared to television ads, the author stated, “In recognizing the importance
of the online world to reaching consumers in the United States, companies spent
$15 billion more on online ads versus television ads in 2016.” This is
important because it shows the huge difference between spending for both
platforms. If this article was written 10 years ago, I’m sure the statistics
would have been switched.
This article fits into the larger
conversation about the topic because this connects to me due to my major. Seeing
how technology has impacted the writing and literature in technology, it made
me realize the world I am going into.
Being
a dual major, I also decided to analyze a source describing the changes
technology made in the financial services industry. The article, “How Fintech
is Changing Business (and Bank Accounts),” by Ryne Landers, introduced how
technology has impacted the financial industry. By combining two words, Fintech
was created. This article described the many ways that technology has changed
the industry and was very informative about these changes. I find it very
interesting to analyze the changes in industries that I will one day work in
because I will become accustomed to these new practices, or even future changes
that will occur before I’m a part of the work force. The author wrote this in
order to inform readers about what technology has done thus far with the
intentions of technology making more changes. The genre of this article was
journalistic writing, as it was written as a news article. The goal of the
author might have influenced the genre because in order to be informative, the
author would have to write this in the form of a news story, rather than a
fictional story. Additionally, the genre may have influenced the project
because journalistic writing is trusted more than a blog post by readers, so it
gives the article credibility.
I personally believe that the
author’s project succeeded in this article because it was very informative and
taught me a lot about applications created that I wasn’t aware of. Before
reading the article, I was convinced that it would speak about how using Excel
has made life easier for budgeting, rather the article gave many examples of
technology in the financial industry and Excel wasn’t even one of them. For
example, one of the examples the author gave was Upstart. When describing
Upstart, the author stated, “A unique personal loan service founded by
ex-Googlers which takes into account your education and occupational history in
addition to your credit scores to provide a more accurate lending rate and
extend opportunities to more people than traditional lending services.”
Besides only talking about
innovative applications, the author also described how FinTech was changing
business and the future of FinTech. By giving a lot of information in one
article that was easy to understand, the author definitely succeeded.
I would hyperlink the article links to the title of that article when writing about it to be more engaging with the audience. In addition, I think you should expand upon your rationale for why Barron's journal article succeeded to bring your opinion into that source analysis more. Really like the personal connections in the other two source analysis. Jake Zeidman
ReplyDeleteI really listened to your advice about hyperlinking the titles of the articles to the websites. Clearly it is now on my final portfolio, but it was good advice. Also, I added more to my Barron source analysis to connect it to the overarching question I've been researching since I didn't have a clear question when I wrote it for the first time. -Lindsay Cohn
Delete